What is Better for Fat Loss: Sprinting or Low-Impact Running?

Fat loss is a primary goal for many individuals engaged in physical fitness. However, the optimal approach to achieve this goal remains a topic of debate. Two popular methods are sprinting and low-impact running. This article will delve into the science behind both activities, comparing their effectiveness for fat loss, and providing actionable insights for incorporating them into your fitness regimen.

Before comparing sprinting and low-impact running, it’s important to understand how fat loss occurs. Fat loss happens when the body uses more energy (calories) than it consumes. This energy deficit forces the body to break down stored fat into fatty acids, which are then utilised for energy.

Sprinting: High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT)

Sprinting, often practised as part of high-intensity interval training (HIIT), is an exercise method that alternates between short bursts of intense activity and periods of rest or low-intensity exercise. This training approach is designed to push the body to its maximum capacity in a short amount of time, offering numerous benefits for fat loss and overall fitness.

The Mechanism of HIIT

Short, Intense Bursts

During sprinting, the body is pushed to near maximal effort for a short duration, typically ranging from 20 to 60 seconds. This high-intensity phase is followed by a recovery period of either complete rest or low-intensity exercise, such as walking or slow jogging, lasting anywhere from 1 to 4 minutes. This cycle is repeated multiple times, with a typical HIIT session lasting between 20 and 30 minutes, including warm-up and cool-down periods.

Enhanced Caloric Burn

The intense effort required during sprinting significantly raises the heart rate and metabolism, leading to a high caloric expenditure in a short period. This is particularly beneficial for individuals looking to burn a substantial number of calories in less time compared to traditional, longer-duration exercises.

How to Do HIIT Cardio to Get To 10% Body Fat

Benefits of Sprinting for Fat Loss

Excess Post-Exercise Oxygen Consumption (EPOC)

One of the key advantages of sprinting is its effect on excess post-exercise oxygen consumption (EPOC). After a HIIT session, the body continues to consume oxygen at an elevated rate to restore itself to its pre-exercise state. This process requires additional energy, resulting in continued calorie burning for several hours post-exercise. Studies have demonstrated that HIIT can elevate EPOC more significantly than steady-state cardio, contributing to greater overall calorie expenditure (LaForgia et al., 2006).

Muscle Preservation and Growth

Sprinting involves explosive, anaerobic movements that engage large muscle groups, particularly in the legs, glutes, and core. This type of training promotes muscle hypertrophy (growth) and strength. Increased muscle mass is beneficial for fat loss as muscle tissue burns more calories at rest compared to fat tissue, thereby boosting the resting metabolic rate (Børsheim & Bahr, 2003).

Hormonal Benefits

High-intensity training like sprinting stimulates the release of hormones that facilitate fat loss. Growth hormone (GH) and adrenaline are two such hormones that are significantly elevated following HIIT sessions. Growth hormone enhances fat metabolism, while adrenaline increases the breakdown of fat cells to be used as energy (Godfrey et al., 2003). These hormonal responses are more pronounced in high-intensity exercises compared to moderate-intensity, steady-state exercises.

Bored of Treadmill Cardio Running in the Gym? Try These 5 Fat Stripping Fun Alternatives Instead

Practical Considerations

Time Efficiency

Sprinting workouts are typically short, making them a time-efficient option for those with busy schedules. A complete HIIT session, including warm-up and cool-down, can be completed in 30 minutes or less, providing a significant workout in a brief period.

Versatility

HIIT and sprinting can be performed using various modalities, including running on a track, treadmill, cycling, rowing, or even bodyweight exercises like burpees and jumping jacks. This versatility allows individuals to choose a format that suits their preferences and fitness levels.

Potential Risks

The high-intensity nature of sprinting can pose a risk of injury, particularly for beginners or those with pre-existing joint issues. Proper warm-up, cool-down, and attention to form are essential to mitigate these risks. Additionally, it’s important to allow adequate recovery time between HIIT sessions to prevent overtraining and injuries.

How Running Once a Week Changes Your Body

Low-Impact Running: Steady-State Cardio

Low-impact running, a form of steady-state cardio, involves maintaining a consistent, moderate pace over an extended period. This type of exercise is renowned for its cardiovascular benefits and lower impact on joints, making it accessible to a broad range of individuals.

The Mechanism of Steady-State Cardio

Continuous, Moderate Intensity

During low-impact running, the individual maintains a steady, moderate pace, typically around 60-70% of their maximum heart rate. This level of intensity can be sustained for longer durations, often ranging from 30 minutes to several hours, depending on the individual’s fitness level and goals.

Sustained Caloric Burn

While the caloric expenditure per minute is lower compared to high-intensity exercises, the extended duration of low-impact running results in a substantial total caloric burn. For example, a person weighing 70 kg running at a moderate pace of 8 km/h can burn approximately 600 calories per hour (Ainsworth et al., 2000).

Benefits of Low-Impact Running for Fat Loss

Optimal Fat Oxidation

During moderate-intensity exercise, the body predominantly uses fat as its primary fuel source. Research indicates that the rate of fat oxidation is highest during activities performed at 60-70% of maximum heart rate, making low-impact running an effective way to utilise and reduce fat stores (Achten & Jeukendrup, 2004).

Cardiovascular Health

Low-impact running provides significant cardiovascular benefits, including improved heart and lung function, reduced risk of cardiovascular diseases, and better blood circulation. These benefits are crucial for overall health and can enhance the body’s efficiency in burning calories and fat.

Sustainability and Low Risk of Injury

One of the major advantages of low-impact running is its sustainability. The moderate intensity reduces the risk of overuse injuries commonly associated with high-impact activities. This makes it a safer option for individuals of all fitness levels, including beginners and those with joint issues. The lower risk of injury means participants are more likely to maintain a consistent running routine, which is essential for long-term fat loss.

How to Combine HIIT and LISS to Lose Fat Faster

Practical Considerations

Accessibility

Low-impact running is highly accessible and can be performed almost anywhere, including parks, trails, treadmills, and urban environments. This ease of access makes it a convenient option for many people.

Mental Health Benefits

Running at a steady pace can also offer psychological benefits, such as reduced stress, improved mood, and enhanced mental clarity. The rhythmic nature of running can serve as a form of active meditation, providing mental as well as physical health benefits (Scully et al., 1998).

Time Commitment

While low-impact running sessions are typically longer than HIIT sessions, they can be more manageable for those who prefer a more leisurely approach to exercise. The longer duration can be seen as a time to unwind and disconnect from daily stressors.

Comparative Analysis: Sprinting vs. Low-Impact Running

To determine which is better for fat loss, sprinting or low-impact running, we need to consider several factors: calorie burn, muscle preservation, metabolic effects, and practicality.

Calorie Burn and Metabolic Effects

Sprinting:

• High-calorie burn during short, intense bursts.
• Significant EPOC effect, leading to continued calorie burn post-exercise.
• Promotes muscle growth, enhancing long-term metabolic rate.

Low-Impact Running:

• Steady caloric burn during the activity, dependent on duration and intensity.
• Lower EPOC effect compared to sprinting.
• Primarily uses fat as a fuel source during exercise.

Muscle Preservation

Sprinting:

• Effective in preserving and building muscle mass due to the high-intensity nature.
• Greater muscle mass leads to a higher resting metabolic rate.

Low-Impact Running:

• Less effective in promoting muscle growth.
• Prolonged endurance exercise can lead to muscle catabolism if not balanced with strength training.

Practicality and Sustainability

Sprinting:

• Requires high intensity and recovery periods, which may be challenging for beginners or those with joint issues.
• Shorter duration sessions, which can be convenient for those with limited time.

Low-Impact Running:

• More sustainable and less risk of injury, making it suitable for a broader population.
• Longer sessions, which may be more time-consuming but easier to maintain consistently.

The Best Cardio For Fat Loss

Combining Sprinting and Low-Impact Running

For those seeking the best of both worlds, combining sprinting and low-impact running can be an effective strategy for fat loss and overall fitness.

Hybrid Training Programs

Incorporating sprint intervals into a low-impact running routine can maximise the benefits of both high-intensity and steady-state cardio. For example, a typical workout might involve a warm-up of low-impact running, followed by several sprint intervals interspersed with jogging or walking, and ending with a cool-down period of low-impact running.

Periodisation

Periodisation involves structuring training cycles that vary in intensity and duration. This approach can include phases of high-intensity sprinting workouts followed by phases of steady-state running, allowing for balanced development of both aerobic and anaerobic fitness. This method can help prevent overtraining and promote continual progress.

Tailoring to Individual Goals

The optimal balance between sprinting and low-impact running will depend on individual goals, fitness levels, and preferences. For example, those with specific performance goals, such as improving speed or endurance for a race, may prioritise one over the other. Conversely, individuals primarily focused on general fitness and fat loss might benefit from a more balanced approach.

Conclusion: Which is Better for Fat Loss?

Both sprinting and low-impact running have their advantages and can be effective for fat loss. The choice between the two should be based on individual preferences, fitness levels, and specific goals.

• Sprinting is highly effective for those looking to maximise calorie burn in a short time, promote muscle growth, and benefit from high-intensity training’s metabolic effects. It’s ideal for individuals who can handle the intensity and are seeking quick, efficient workouts.
• Low-impact running is a sustainable, lower-risk option suitable for a wide range of individuals. It provides consistent calorie burn, utilises fat stores during exercise, and can be maintained over the long term, which is crucial for lasting fat loss.

For optimal results, a combination of both methods can be highly effective. Incorporating sprinting sessions into a routine primarily focused on low-impact running can provide the benefits of both high-intensity and steady-state cardio, leading to enhanced fat loss and overall fitness.

5 Excellent Exercises to Promote Fat Loss

References

Achten, J., & Jeukendrup, A. E. (2004). Optimizing fat oxidation through exercise and diet. Nutrition, 20(7-8), 716-727.

Børsheim, E., & Bahr, R. (2003). Effect of exercise intensity, duration and mode on post-exercise oxygen consumption. Sports Medicine, 33(14), 1037-1060.

Godfrey, R. J., Madgwick, Z., & Whyte, G. P. (2003). The exercise-induced growth hormone response in athletes. Sports Medicine, 33(8), 599-613.

LaForgia, J., Withers, R. T., & Gore, C. J. (2006). Effects of exercise intensity and duration on the excess post-exercise oxygen consumption. Journal of Sports Sciences, 24(12), 1247-1264.

Scully, D., Kremer, J., Meade, M. M., Graham, R., & Dudgeon, K. (1998). Physical exercise and psychological well being: a critical review. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 32(2), 111-120.

Key Takeaways

Factor	Sprinting	Low-Impact Running
Calorie Burn	High during activity and post-exercise (EPOC)	Steady during activity
Muscle Preservation	Promotes muscle growth	Less effective in muscle preservation
Metabolic Effects	Increases resting metabolic rate	Primarily uses fat as fuel during exercise
Practicality	Short, intense sessions; higher injury risk	Longer, steady sessions; lower injury risk
Sustainability	May be challenging for beginners	Suitable for a broad population

Was this article helpful?